conservative – Jesse Steele

Grow When Rejected

Jesse SteeleNovember 3, 2019November 3, 2019

It’s one of the hardest things to hear: “You keep losing because you do bad work.”

We work so hard, but it still doesn’t cut it. We learn, we improve, but no one accepts our work. God told Cain, “If you do good work, it will be accepted,” but He never promised that it would be accepted by everyone. “If not,” He continued, “sin is right their waiting for you and you must master it.”

Few things make us angrier than our hard work being rejected. If you can keep improving without complaining, you’ll have been approved by hard times. · · · →

In Blog

Why Blacks in the Hood Should Vote Conservative

Jesse SteeleApril 27, 2012Leave a comment

1. Conservatives support carrying hand guns for self-defense. Blacks in the ghetto know how important that can be. Conservatism would have wanted Trayvon to be able to defend himself and “stand his ground” also.

2. Conservatives want it to be easy to start your own business. The biggest problem isn’t having start-up money, but getting the government bureaucracy out of the way. With the FairTax.org system, for example, you could hire employees without having to pay a CPA. Just give them money, that’s it… legally. But Democrats want to punish you if you have your own business ideas or if you give jobs to your friends.

3. Bling bling. They call it “taxing the rich”, but let’s call it “hating on the bling bling”. I like bling and you should too. Democrats aren’t your friends if you’re ’boutit ’boutit and like bling.

4. With big government out of the way, you don’t need a college degree to get ahead. · · · →

In Blog

Electability

Jesse SteeleDecember 24, 2011Leave a comment

The next big division in America may be over how to deal with political Moderates. It’s become a big problem. But what caused it? Because we let the Moderate problem got out of hand, we have no one to blame but ourselves. We haven’t reigned them in properly. And using the same methods that gave them power won’t reverse anything.

On the one hand, we have the third-party voters. “I don’t like either guy, so I’m going third party! It’s about principal,” they say. Okay, but which principals? Make sure that you elect a candidate who is either 100% perfect or 100% wrong—that principal? If so, okay. But good philosophies need to work. All the ideals in the world are useless if the candidate can’t get elected. What’s the difference between a perfectly unelectable candidate and a liar who breaks his campaign promises? I’d say, the difference is typically about 45% in the polls—except Ross Perrot narrowed that gap in 1992, helping elect Clinton. · · · →